V. Gaubas
To Win
A. Pellegrino
To Win
Vilius Gaubas vs Sandro Kopp Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W W W W W W L W W
Form
L W L W W L W W W WHead To Head: Gaubas 0 - 0 Kopp
| Gaubas | Stats | Kopp |
|---|---|---|
| 55% (12-10) | YTD Win/Loss | 66% (21-11) |
| 0 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 149 | Ranking | 422 |
| 144 | Highest Rank | 307 |
| 20 | Age | 24 |
| - | Plays | R |
| 6 | Titles | 5 |
| 59% (141-96) | Career Total W/L | 58% (250-182) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $5,660 |
| 1 | YTD Titles | 0 |
Upcoming Match
24 Apr 2025 / Quarterfinals
ODDS
Upcoming Match
24 Apr 2025 / Quarterfinals
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Sabalenka VS Blinkova PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Maneiro VS Frech PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
No H2H Matches Available
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Vilius Gaubas Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats 
Vilius Gaubas
Player
Oleg Prihodko
90%
(
36 of
40)
1st Serve %
65%
(
32 of
49)
5
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
81%
(
29 of
36)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
75%
(
3 of
4)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
8 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
25 of
49)
57
Total Points Won
32
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Vilius Gaubas
Player
Khumoun Sultanov
63%
(
52 of
82)
1st Serve %
58%
(
55 of
95)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
71%
(
37 of
52)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
35 of
55)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
19 of
40)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
34%
(
28 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
41 of
95)
95
Total Points Won
82
|
3-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Marin Cilic
Player
Vilius Gaubas
66%
(
71 of
108)
1st Serve %
63%
(
82 of
130)
12
Aces
13
1
Double Faults
1
82%
(
58 of
71)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
55 of
82)
57%
(
21 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
28 of
48)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
27%
(
29 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
47 of
130)
126
Total Points Won
112
|
6-7(6) 6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Vilius Gaubas
Player
Sebastian Ofner
75%
(
56 of
75)
1st Serve %
59%
(
52 of
88)
7
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
2
77%
(
43 of
56)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
35 of
52)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
29%
(
22 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
36 of
88)
89
Total Points Won
74
|
4-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Vilius Gaubas
Player
Lorenzo Giustino
68%
(
72 of
106)
1st Serve %
62%
(
69 of
111)
3
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
3
67%
(
48 of
72)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
47 of
69)
62%
(
21 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
35%
(
37 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
42 of
111)
111
Total Points Won
106
|
4-6 7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Vilius Gaubas
Player
Pol Martin Tiffon
71%
(
34 of
48)
1st Serve %
58%
(
34 of
59)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
68%
(
23 of
34)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
16 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
31 of
59)
63
Total Points Won
44
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Vilius Gaubas
Player
Ignacio Buse
66%
(
60 of
91)
1st Serve %
65%
(
51 of
79)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
67%
(
40 of
60)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
36 of
51)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
33 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
28 of
79)
86
Total Points Won
84
|
6-4 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Vilius Gaubas
Player
Sebastian Ofner
54%
(
43 of
79)
1st Serve %
52%
(
34 of
66)
3
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
5
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
21 of
34)
50%
(
18 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
39%
(
31 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
30 of
66)
78
Total Points Won
67
|
7-6(2) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Vilius Gaubas
Player
Arthur Gea
61%
(
37 of
61)
1st Serve %
59%
(
47 of
79)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
36%
(
22 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
39 of
79)
78
Total Points Won
62
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Vilius Gaubas
Player
Henri Squire
65%
(
39 of
60)
1st Serve %
53%
(
39 of
73)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
8
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
20 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
34 of
73)
74
Total Points Won
59
|
6-0 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
view more
Sandro Kopp Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Sandro Kopp
Player
Hady Habib
54%
(
39 of
72)
1st Serve %
70%
(
54 of
77)
7
Aces
9
1
Double Faults
2
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
36 of
54)
64%
(
21 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
29%
(
21 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
31 of
77)
82
Total Points Won
67
|
7-5 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sandro Kopp
Player
Denis Yevseyev
61%
(
39 of
64)
1st Serve %
67%
(
43 of
64)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
62%
(
24 of
39)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
28 of
43)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
38%
(
24 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
29 of
64)
69
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sandro Kopp
Player
Elias Ymer
62%
(
38 of
61)
1st Serve %
58%
(
35 of
60)
5
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
22 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
60)
67
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Sandro Kopp
Player
Federico Iannaccone
67%
(
62 of
93)
1st Serve %
65%
(
55 of
84)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
68%
(
42 of
62)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
31 of
55)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
39%
(
36 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
39 of
84)
96
Total Points Won
81
|
6-3 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Viacheslav Bielinskyi
Player
Sandro Kopp
85%
(
51 of
60)
1st Serve %
68%
(
38 of
56)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
63%
(
32 of
51)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
44%
(
4 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
4 of
18)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
40%
(
24 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
31 of
56)
67
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Sandro Kopp
Player
Tadeas Paroulek
62%
(
34 of
55)
1st Serve %
49%
(
27 of
55)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
18 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
30 of
55)
67
Total Points Won
43
|
7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sandro Kopp
Player
Sebastian Sorger
63%
(
57 of
91)
1st Serve %
61%
(
44 of
72)
6
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
61%
(
35 of
57)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
50%
(
17 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
43%
(
39 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
30 of
72)
82
Total Points Won
81
|
5-7 6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Moise Kouame
Player
Sandro Kopp
67%
(
49 of
73)
1st Serve %
59%
(
44 of
75)
7
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
4
65%
(
32 of
49)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
30 of
44)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
37%
(
27 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
33 of
75)
79
Total Points Won
69
|
6-3 3-6 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sandro Kopp
Player
Aleksandr Lobanov
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve %
63%
(
36 of
57)
5
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
1
93%
(
26 of
28)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
67%
(
6 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
14%
(
5 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
27 of
57)
59
Total Points Won
35
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Nikolas Sanchez-Izquierdo
Player
Sandro Kopp
76%
(
35 of
46)
1st Serve %
73%
(
32 of
44)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
57%
(
20 of
35)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
20 of
32)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
43%
(
20 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
20 of
44)
46
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 59% (141/96) | Win/Loss | 58% (250/182) |
| 56% (312/246) | Sets Win/Loss | 56% (560/432) |
| 52% (2766/2540) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (4796/4415) |
| 48% (16/17) | Hard Win/Loss | 52% (25/23) |
| 64% (121/69) | Clay Win/Loss | 59% (189/132) |
| 29% (4/10) | Indoor Hard W/L | 57% (36/27) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.19 | Aces Per Game | 0.2 |
| 501 | Aces Total | 903 |
| 0.16 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.14 |
| 414 | Total Double Faults | 615 |
| 1:47:28 | Average Match Time | 1:21:47 |
| 391.18 | Average Opponent Rank | 419.94 |
| 65% (10289/15739) | 1st Serve % | 68% (15606/22994) |
| 65% (6736/10289) | 1st Serve Win % | 66% (10249/15606) |
| 49% (2672/5450) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (3746/7388) |
| 45% (739/1639) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 42% (1000/2361) |
| 41% (6458/15599) | Return Points Win % | 40% (9373/23352) |
| 50% (2/2) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 25% (2/6) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 40% (2/3) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 55% (49/40) | Challenger W/L | 44% (28/35) |
| 65% (88/48) | Futures W/L | 60% (220/144) |
| 59% (138/233) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 58% (247/428) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 55% (36/65) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 53% (61/116) |
| 63% (54/86) | Deciding Set Win % | 51% (67/131) |
| 88% (121/106) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 84% (251/212) |
| 12% (121/15) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 16% (251/39) |
| 30% (116/35) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 20% (181/37) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
